首页 股票 期货 投行 债券 营销 基金 会计 风投 外汇

经典生活  美好享受

找乐 健身 电影 听歌 聊天 讲演
泡吧 旅游 DV 电游 恋爱 台球

乐(FUN)-找乐


您的位置: 首页--讲演-本页


26.Lyndon Baines Johnson: Renunciation Speech


Good evening, my fellow Americans:


Tonight I want to speak to you of peace in Vietnam and Southeast Asia. No
other question so preoccupies our people. No other dream so absorbs the
250 million human beings who live in that part of the world. No other goal
motivates American policy in Southeast Asia.

For years, representatives of our Governments and others have traveled the
world seeking to find a basis for peace talks. Since last September they
have carried the offer that I made public at San Antonio. And that offer
was this:

That the United States would stop its bombardment of North Vietnam when
that would lead promptly to productive discussions -- and that we would
assume that North Vietnam would not take military advantage of our
restraint.

Hanoi denounced this offer, both privately and publicly. Even while the
search for peace was going on, North Vietnam rushed their preparations for
a savage assault on the people, the government, and the allies of South
Vietnam. Their attack -- during the Tet holidays -- failed to achieve its
principal objectives. It did not collapse the elected Government of South
Vietnam or shatter its army -- as the Communists had hoped. It did not
produce a "general uprising" among the people of the cities, as they had
predicted. The Communists were unable to maintain control of any of the
more than 30 cities that they attacked. And they took very heavy
casualties. But they did compel the South Vietnamese and their allies to
move certain forces from the countryside into the cities. They caused
widespread disruption and suffering. Their attacks, and the battles that
followed, made refugees of half a million human beings.
The Communists may renew their attack any day. They are, it appears,
trying to make 1968 the year of decision in South Vietnam -- the year that
brings, if not final victory or defeat, at least a turning point in the
struggle.
This much is clear: If they do mount another round of heavy attacks, they
will not succeed in destroying the fighting power of South Vietnam and its
allies. But tragically, this is also clear: Many men -- on both sides of
the struggle -- will be lost. A nation that has already suffered 20 years
of warfare will suffer once again. Armies on both sides will take new
casualties. And the war will go on. There is no need for this to be so.
There is no need to delay the talks that could bring an end to this long
and this bloody war.
Tonight, I renew the offer I made last August: to stop the bombardment of
North Vietnam. We ask that talks begin promptly, that they be serious
talks on the substance of peace. We assume that during those talks Hanoi
will not take advantage of our restraint. We are prepared to move
immediately toward peace through negotiations. So tonight, in the hope
that this action will lead to early talks, I am taking the first step to
de-escalate the conflict. We are reducing -- substantially reducing -- the
present level of hostilities, and we are doing so unilaterally and at
once.
Tonight, I have ordered our aircraft and our naval vessels to make no
attacks on North Vietnam, except in the area north of the demilitarized
zone where the continuing enemy buildup directly threatens allied forward
positions and where the movements of their troops and supplies are clearly
related to that threat. The area in which we are stopping our attacks
includes almost 90 percent of North Vietnam's population, and most of its
territory. Thus, there will be no attacks around the principal populated
areas, or in the food-producing areas of North Vietnam.
Even this very limited bombing of the North could come to an early end --
if our restraint is matched by restraint in Hanoi. But I cannot in good
conscience stop all bombing so long as to do so would immediately and
directly endanger the lives of our men and our allies. Whether a complete
bombing halt becomes possible in the future will be determined by events.
Our purpose in this action is to bring about a reduction in the level of
violence that now exists. It is to save the lives of brave men --and to
save the lives of innocent women and children. It is to permit the
contending forces to move closer to a political settlement. And tonight I
call upon the United Kingdom and I call upon the Soviet Union -- as
co-chairmen of the Geneva conferences, and as permanent members of the
United Nations Security Council -- to do all they can to move from the
unilateral act of de-escalation that I have just announced toward genuine
peace in Southeast Asia.
Now, as in the past, the United States is ready to send its
representatives to any forum, at any time, to discuss the means of
bringing this ugly war to an end. I am designating one of our most
distinguished Americans, Ambassador Averell Harriman, as my personal
representative for such talks. In addition, I have asked Ambassador
Llewellyn Thompson, who returned from Moscow for consultation, to be
available to join Ambassador Harriman at Geneva or any other suitable
place --just as soon as Hanoi agrees to a conference.
I call upon President Ho Chi Minh to respond positively, and favorably, to
this new step toward peace. But if peace does not come now through
negotiations, it will come when Hanoi understands that our common resolve
is unshakable, and our common strength is invincible.
Tonight, we and the other allied nations are contributing 600,000 fighting
men to assist 700,000 South Vietnamese troops in defending their little
country. Our presence there has always rested on this basic belief: The
main burden of preserving their freedom must be carried out by them -- by
the South Vietnamese themselves.
We and our allies can only help to provide a shield behind which the
people of South Vietnam can survive and can grow and develop. On their
efforts -- on their determinations and resourcefulness --the outcome will
ultimately depend. That small, beleaguered nation has suffered terrible
punishment for more than 20 years. I pay tribute once again tonight to the
great courage and the endurance of its people. South Vietnam supports
armed forces tonight of almost 700,000 men, and I call your attention to
the fact that that is the equivalent of more than 10 million in our own
population. Its people maintain their firm determination to be free of
domination by the North.
There has been substantial progress, I think, in building a durable
government during these last three years. The South Vietnam of 1965 could
not have survived the enemy's Tet offensive of 1968. The elected
government of South Vietnam survived that attack -- and is rapidly
repairing the devastation that it wrought. The South Vietnamese know that
further efforts are going to be required to expand their own armed forces;
to move back into the countryside as quickly as possible; to increase
their taxes; to select the very best men that they have for civil and
military responsibilities; to achieve a new unity within their
constitutional government, and to include in the national effort all those
groups who wish to preserve South Vietnam's control over its own destiny.
Last week President Thieu ordered the mobilization of 135,000 additional
South Vietnamese. He plans to reach as soon as possible a total military
strength of more than 800,000 men. To achieve this, the Government of
South Vietnam started the drafting of 19-year-olds on March 1st. On May
1st, the Government will begin the drafting of 18-year-olds. Last month,
10,000 men volunteered for military service. That was two and a half times
the number of volunteers during the same month last year. Since the middle
of January, more than 48,000 South Vietnamese have joined the armed
forces, and nearly half of them volunteered to do so.
All men in the South Vietnamese armed forces have had their tours of duty
extended for the duration of the war, and reserves are now being called up
for immediate active duty. President Thieu told his people last week, and
I quote:
"We must make greater efforts, we must accept more sacrifices, because as
I have said many times, this is our country. The existence of our nation
is at stake, and this is mainly a Vietnamese responsibility."
He warned his people that a major national effort is required to root out
corruption and incompetence at all levels of government. We applaud this
evidence of determination on the part of South Vietnam. Our first priority
will be to support their effort. We shall accelerate the re-equipment of
South Vietnam's armed forces in order to meet the enemy's increased
firepower. And this will enable them progressively to undertake a larger
share of combat operations against the Communist invaders.
On many occasions I have told the American people that we would send to
Vietnam those forces that are required to accomplish our mission there. So
with that as our guide we have previously authorized a force level of
approximately 525,000. Some weeks ago to help meet the enemy's new
offensive we sent to Vietnam about 11,000 additional Marine and airborne
troops. They were deployed by air in 48 hours on an emergency basis. But
the artillery and the tank and the aircraft and medical and other units
that were needed to work with and support these infantry troops in combat
could not then accompany them by air on that short notice.
In order that these forces may reach maximum combat effectiveness, the
Joint Chiefs of Staff have recommended to me that we should prepare to
send during the next five months the support troops totaling approximately
13,500 men. A portion of these men will be made available from our active
forces. The balance will come from reserve component units, which will be
called up for service.
The actions that we have taken since the beginning of the year to re-equip
the South Vietnamese forces; to meet our responsibilities in Korea, as
well as our responsibilities in Vietnam; to meet price increases and the
cost of activating and deploying these reserve forces; to replace
helicopters and provide the other military supplies we need, all of these
actions are going to require additional expenditures. The tentative
estimate of those additional expenditures is 2 1/2 billion dollars in this
fiscal year and 2 billion, 600 million in the next fiscal year. These
projected increases in expenditures for our national security will bring
into sharper focus the nation's need for immediate action, action to
protect the prosperity of the American people and to protect the strength
and the stability of our American dollar.
On many occasions I have pointed out that without a tax bill or decreased
expenditures, next year's deficit would again be around $20 billion. I
have emphasized the need to set strict priorities in our spending. I have
stressed that failure to act -- and to act promptly and decisively --
would raise very strong doubts throughout the world about America's
willingness to keep its financial house in order.
Yet Congress has not acted. And tonight we face the sharpest financial
threat in the postwar era -- a threat to the dollar's role as the keystone
of international trade and finance in the world.
Last week, at the monetary conference in Stockholm, the major industrial
countries decided to take a big step toward creating a new international
monetary asset that will strengthen the international monetary system. And
I'm very proud of the very able work done by Secretary Fowler and Chairman
Martin of the Federal Reserve Board. But to make this system work, the
United States just must bring its balance of payments to -- or very close
to -- equilibrium. We must have a responsible fiscal policy in this
country. The passage of a tax bill now, together with expenditure control
that the Congress may desire and dictate, is absolutely necessary to
protect this nation’s security, and to continue our prosperity, and to
meet the needs of our people.
Now, what is at stake is seven years of unparalleled prosperity. In those
seven years, the real income of the average American, after taxes, rose by
almost 30 percent -- a gain as large as that of the entire preceding 19
years. So the steps that we must take to convince the world are exactly
the steps that we must take to sustain our own economic strength here at
home. In the past eight months, prices and interest rates have risen
because of our inaction. We must therefore now do everything we can to
move from debate to action, from talking to voting and there is, I believe
-- I hope there is -- in both Houses of the Congress a growing sense of
urgency that this situation just must be acted upon and must be corrected.
My budget in January, we thought, was a tight one. It fully reflected our
evaluation of most of the demanding needs of this nation. But in these
budgetary matters, the President does not decide alone. The Congress has
the power, and the duty, to determine appropriations and taxes. And the
Congress is now considering our proposals, and they are considering
reductions in the budget that we submitted.
As part of a program of fiscal restraint that includes the tax surcharge,
I shall approve appropriate reductions in the January budget when and if
Congress so decides that that should be done. One thing is unmistakably
clear, however. Our deficit just must be reduced. Failure to act could
bring on conditions that would strike hardest at those people that all of
us are trying so hard to help
So these times call for prudence in this land of plenty. And I believe
that we have the character to provide it, and tonight I plead with the
Congress and with the people to act promptly to serve the national
interest and thereby serve all of our people.
Now let me give you my estimate of the chances for peace -- the peace that
will one day stop the bloodshed in South Vietnam; that will -- all the
Vietnamese people [will] be permitted to rebuild and develop their land;
that will permit us to turn more fully to our own tasks here at home. I
cannot promise that the initiative that I have announced tonight will be
completely successful in achieving peace any more than the 30 others that
we have undertaken and agreed to in recent years. But it is our fervent
hope that North Vietnam, after years of fighting that has left the issue
unresolved, will now cease its efforts to achieve a military victory and
will join with us in moving toward the peace table.
And there may come a time when South Vietnamese -- on both sides -- are
able to work out a way to settle their own differences by free political
choice rather than by war. As Hanoi considers its course, it should be in
no doubt of our intentions. It must not miscalculate the pressures within
our democracy in this election year. We have no intention of widening this
war. But the United States will never accept a fake solution to this long
and arduous struggle and call it peace.
No one can foretell the precise terms of an eventual settlement. Our
objective in South Vietnam has never been the annihilation of the enemy.
It has been to bring about a recognition in Hanoi that its objective --
taking over the South by force -- could not be achieved. We think that
peace can be based on the Geneva Accords of 1954, under political
conditions that permit the South Vietnamese -- all the South Vietnamese --
to chart their course free of any outside domination or interference, from
us or from anyone else.
So tonight, I reaffirm the pledge that we made at Manila: that we are
prepared to withdraw our forces from South Vietnam as the other side
withdraws its forces to the North, stops the infiltration, and the level
of violence thus subsides. Our goal of peace and self-determination in
Vietnam is directly related to the future of all of Southeast Asia, where
much has happened to inspire confidence during the past 10 years. And we
have done all that we knew how to do to contribute and to help build that
confidence.
A number of its nations have shown what can be accomplished under
conditions of security. Since 1966, Indonesia, the fifth largest nation in
all the world, with a population of more than 100 million people, has had
a government that’s dedicated to peace with its neighbors and improved
conditions for its own people.
Political and economic cooperation between nations has grown rapidly. And
I think every American can take a great deal of pride in the role that we
have played in bringing this about in Southeast Asia. We can rightly judge
-- as responsible Southeast Asians themselves do -- that the progress of
the past three years would have been far less likely, if not completely
impossible, if America's sons and others had not made their stand in
Vietnam.
At Johns Hopkins University about three years ago, I announced that the
United States would take part in the great work of developing Southeast
Asia, including the Mekong valley, for all the people of that region. Our
determination to help build a better land -- a better land for men on both
sides of the present conflict -- has not diminished in the least. Indeed,
the ravages of war, I think, have made it more urgent than ever.
So I repeat on behalf of the United States again tonight what I said at
Johns Hopkins -- that North Vietnam could take its place in this common
effort just as soon as peace comes. Over time, a wider framework of peace
and security in Southeast Asia may become possible. The new cooperations
of the nations of the area could be a foundation stone. Certainly
friendship with the nations of such a Southeast Asia is what the United
States seeks -- and that is all that the United States seeks.
One day, my fellow citizen, there will be peace in Southeast Asia. It will
come because the people of Southeast Asia want it -- those whose armies
are at war tonight; those who, though threatened, have thus far been
spared. Peace will come because Asians were willing to work for it and to
sacrifice for it -- and to die by the thousands for it. But let it never
be forgotten: peace will come also because America sent her sons to help
secure it.
It has not been easy -- far from it. During the past four and a half
years, it has been my fate and my responsibility to be Commander in Chief.
I have lived daily and nightly with the cost of this war. I know the pain
that it has inflicted. I know perhaps better than anyone the misgivings
that it has aroused. And throughout this entire long period I have been
sustained by a single principle: that what we are doing now in Vietnam is
vital not only to the security of Southeast Asia, but it is vital to the
security of every American.
Surely, we have treaties which we must respect. Surely, we have
commitments that we are going to keep. Resolutions of the Congress testify
to the need to resist aggression in the world and in Southeast Asia.
But the heart of our involvement in South Vietnam under three different
presidents, three separate Administrations, has always been America's own
security. And the larger purpose of our involvement has always been to
help the nations of Southeast Asia become independent, and stand alone,
self-sustaining as members of a great world community, at peace with
themselves, at peace with all others. And with such a nation our country
-- and the world -- will be far more secure than it is tonight.
I believe that a peaceful Asia is far nearer to reality because of what
America has done in Vietnam. I believe that the men who endure the dangers
of battle there, fighting there for us tonight, are helping the entire
world avoid far greater conflicts, far wider wars, far more destruction,
than this one. The peace that will bring them home someday will come.
Tonight, I have offered the first in what I hope will be a series of
mutual moves toward peace.
I pray that it will not be rejected by the leaders of North Vietnam. I
pray that they will accept it as a means by which the sacrifices of their
own people may be ended. And I ask your help and your support, my fellow
citizens, for this effort to reach across the battlefield toward an early
peace.
Finally, my fellow Americans, let me say this:
Of those to whom much is given, much is asked. I cannot say -- and no man
could say -- that no more will be asked of us. Yet I believe that now, no
less than when the decade began, this generation of Americans is willing
to pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship, support any friend,
oppose any foe, to assure the survival, and the success, of liberty.
Since those words were spoken by John F. Kennedy, the people of America
have kept that compact with mankind's noblest cause. And we shall continue
to keep it.
Yet, I believe that we must always be mindful of this one thing --
whatever the trials and the tests ahead, the ultimate strength of our
country and our cause will lie, not in powerful weapons or infinite
resources or boundless wealth, but will lie in the unity of our people.
This I believe very deeply. Throughout my entire public career I have
followed the personal philosophy that I am a free man, an American, a
public servant, and a member of my party -- in that order -- always and
only.
For 37 years in the service of our nation, first as a Congressman, as a
Senator, and as Vice President, and now as your President, I have put the
unity of the people first. I have put it ahead of any divisive
partisanship. And in these times as in times before, it is true that a
house divided against itself by the spirit of faction, of party, of
region, of religion, of race, is a house that cannot stand.
There is division in the American house now. There is divisiveness among
us all tonight. And holding the trust that is mine, as President of all
the people, I cannot disregard the peril to the progress of the American
people and the hope and the prospects of peace for all peoples. So, I
would ask all Americans, whatever their personal interests or concern, to
guard against divisiveness and all of its ugly consequences.
Fifty-two months and ten days ago, in a moment of tragedy and trauma, the
duties of this office fell upon me. ?I asked then for your help and God's,
that we might continue America on its course, binding up our wounds,
healing our history, moving forward in new unity to clear the American
agenda and to keep the American commitment for all of our people.
United we have kept that commitment. And united we have enlarged that
commitment. And through all time to come I think America will be a
stronger nation, a more just society, a land of greater opportunity and
fulfillment because of what we have all done together in these years of
unparalleled achievement.
Our reward will come in the life of freedom and peace and hope that our
children will enjoy through ages ahead. What we won when all of our people
united just must not now be lost in suspicion and distrust and selfishness
and politics among any of our people. And believing this, as I do, I have
concluded that I should not permit the Presidency to become involved in
the partisan divisions that are developing in this political year.
With American sons in the fields far away, with America's future under
challenge right here at home, with our hopes and the world's hopes for
peace in the balance every day, I do not believe that I should devote an
hour or a day of my time to any personal partisan causes or to any duties
other than the awesome duties of this office -- the Presidency of your
country.
Accordingly, I shall not seek, and I will not accept, the nomination of my
party for another term as your President. But let men everywhere know,
however, that a strong and a confident and a vigilant America stands ready
tonight to seek an honorable peace; and stands ready tonight to defend an
honored cause, whatever the price, whatever the burden, whatever the
sacrifice that duty may require.
Thank you for listening. Good night and God bless all of you.

 

 


 


关于我们 产品服务 征稿启示 免责条款 读者反馈


2006-2008年·大连爱凯恩咨询有限公司版权所有
咨询邮箱:info@icane.cn
服务电话:0411-81132069图文传真:0411-39797078
网络支持:大连信息港(辽ICP备06016820号